TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsNSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Device Security(2 mappings)

CPG-2.AAsset Inventory
→QRCM-1.1Cryptographic Asset Inventory
CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices
→QRCM-1.1Cryptographic Asset Inventory

Data Security(6 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection3 targets
→QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
→QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
→QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage3 targets
→QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
→QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
→QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Other NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography comparisons

SLSA vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsISO 27043 vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography5 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography4 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 4 map directly to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.