TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsNIST SP 800-92

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-92. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-92 with 34% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Account Security(3 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance

Device Security(4 mappings)

CPG-2.AAsset Inventory2 targets
→NISTSP92-2Log Generation: OS, Application, Security Tools, Network, Cloud, Required Event Content
→NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations
CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices2 targets
→NISTSP92-2Log Generation: OS, Application, Security Tools, Network, Cloud, Required Event Content
→NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations

Data Security(4 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection2 targets
→NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage2 targets
→NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control

Governance & Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control

Governance and Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control

Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
→NISTSP92-5Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review

Supply Chain and Third Party(1 mappings)

CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
→NISTSP92-1Log Management Programme, Policy, Roles, and Operational Runbooks

Network Segmentation(4 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation2 targets
→NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS2 targets
→NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance
→NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-92 comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-927 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-927 mappingsISO 27043 vs NIST SP 800-927 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs NIST SP 800-927 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-926 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs NIST SP 800-926 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-926 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-926 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST SP 800-92?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-92 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-92 equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST SP 800-92?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 13 map directly to NIST SP 800-92 controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to NIST SP 800-92?

26 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-92. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST SP 800-92?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.