Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsNigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023)

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023) with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Data Security(2 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection
NOBRF-4.2Data Encryption Requirements
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
NOBRF-4.2Data Encryption Requirements

Network Segmentation(1 mappings)

CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
NOBRF-4.2Data Encryption Requirements

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023)?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023)?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 3 map directly to Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023)?

36 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Nigeria Open Banking Regulatory Framework (CBN, 2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.