TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsJapan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Response and Recovery(1 mappings)

BMA-14Cyber Insurance
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements

Data Security(14 mappings)

CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection3 targets
→Art. 48Criminal Penalties
→Art. 72Criminal Sanctions
→URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)
DS-1Security Safeguards5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing
→HUN-2Definitions
→HUN-3Fundamental Rules
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls6 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing
→HUN-2Definitions
→HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Supply Chain and Third Party(5 mappings)

CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting5 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
→Art.2Definitions
→Art.8Prohibited Acts

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange23 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs South Korea ISMS-P19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202219 mappings

Other Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 40 controls across its framework, while Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Response and Recovery, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

Of 40 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 5 map directly to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services. The highest concentration of gaps is in Response and Recovery with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

The domain with the highest gap count is Response and Recovery (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.