Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsJapan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services with 16% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Consent and Authorization(7 mappings)

CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework
Art. 2Consent Definition
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal6 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing
HUN-2Definitions
HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Privacy and Security Safeguards(5 mappings)

CDR-11Data Minimization5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing
HUN-2Definitions
HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Data Holder Obligations(3 mappings)

CDR-6IT and Security Requirements3 targets
Art. 48Criminal Penalties
Art. 72Criminal Sanctions
URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)

Compliance and Enforcement(5 mappings)

EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
Art. 72Criminal Sanctions
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
Art. 72Criminal Sanctions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting2 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Other Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 34 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 8 map directly to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

42 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Japan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.