CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsISO 22318
See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to ISO 22318. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to ISO 22318 with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Data Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Response and Recovery(7 mappings)
Supply Chain and Third Party(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Other ISO 22318 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 22318?
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 40 controls across its framework, while ISO 22318 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Data Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct ISO 22318 equivalent.
How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 22318?
Of 40 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 4 map directly to ISO 22318 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to ISO 22318?
36 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22318. The highest concentration of gaps is in Data Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 22318?
The domain with the highest gap count is Data Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.