TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Data Security(3 mappings)

CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption3 targets
→Art. 25Criminal Penalties
→Art. 25Criminal Penalties
→URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)

Supply Chain(1 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems

Supply Chain and Third Party(6 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting5 targets
→Art. 17Quality Management System
→Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
→Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
→Art.2Scope
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs OWASP ASVS14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)13 mappings

Other Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) comparisons

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)19 mappingsUzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsPortugal Law No. 58/2019 - Data Protection Implementation Act vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsAzerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsMalta Data Protection Act (Cap. 586, 2018) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 716 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 4 map directly to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.