Cross-Framework Mapping

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)vsTennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)

See exactly how Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls map to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) maps to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) with 45% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title III - Consent and Lawful Bases(6 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership6 targets
CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability

Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors(5 mappings)

Art. 14 quaterProtection by Design and Default2 targets
LEB-15Penalties and Enforcement
PY-12Penalties
Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
TIPA-1Definitions
Art. 15 terData Protection Impact Assessment2 targets
LEB-15Penalties and Enforcement
PY-12Penalties

Title V - Sensitive Data and Special Categories(2 mappings)

Art. 16 terBiometric Data2 targets
CTDPA-9Consent for Sensitive Data
TIPA-8Sensitive Data Consent

Title I - General Provisions and Definitions(2 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
TIPA-1Definitions

Title VI - Cross-Border Transfers(1 mappings)

Art. 28Administrative Measures
PY-11Supervisory Authority

Title VII - Data Protection Agency and Enforcement(4 mappings)

Art. 30Privacy Policy4 targets
CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization
CPA-CR-1Right to Access

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) comparisons

Other Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) has 29 controls across its framework, while Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors, where 4 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

Of 29 total Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls, 13 map directly to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

16 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct equivalent in Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.