Cross-Framework Mapping

C2M2vsTSA Pipeline Security

See exactly how C2M2 controls map to TSA Pipeline Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

C2M2 maps to TSA Pipeline Security with 58% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 C2M2 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

C2M2: Access Management(11 mappings)

C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment5 targets
TSA-PL-05Access Control
TSA-PL-07Patch and Vulnerability Management
TSA-PL-08Electronic access perimeter management
TSA-PL-10Revocation of access procedures
TSA-PL-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
C2M2-08Electronic access perimeter management3 targets
TSA-PL-05Access Control
TSA-PL-08Electronic access perimeter management
TSA-PL-10Revocation of access procedures
C2M2-10Revocation of access procedures3 targets
TSA-PL-05Access Control
TSA-PL-08Electronic access perimeter management
TSA-PL-10Revocation of access procedures

C2M2: Systems Security(8 mappings)

C2M2-11Security patch management for OT2 targets
TSA-PL-07Patch and Vulnerability Management
TSA-PL-11Security patch management for OT
C2M2-12Malware prevention for operational systems
TSA-PL-12Malware prevention for operational systems
C2M2-13Network security monitoring3 targets
TSA-PL-04Network Segmentation
TSA-PL-06Continuous Monitoring and Detection
TSA-PL-13Network security monitoring
C2M2-14System security hardening2 targets
TSA-PL-14System security hardening
TSA-PL-22Configuration management for OT systems

C2M2: Incident Response & Recovery(1 mappings)

C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
TSA-PL-18Reporting obligations to authorities

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between C2M2 and TSA Pipeline Security?

C2M2 has 24 controls across its framework, while TSA Pipeline Security covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance, where 5 C2M2 controls have no direct TSA Pipeline Security equivalent.

How many controls map between C2M2 and TSA Pipeline Security?

Of 24 total C2M2 controls, 14 map directly to TSA Pipeline Security controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping C2M2 to TSA Pipeline Security?

10 C2M2 controls have no direct equivalent in TSA Pipeline Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between C2M2 and TSA Pipeline Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.