BSI IT-GrundschutzvsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 47% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity(3 mappings)
BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection(1 mappings)
BSI IT-Grundschutz: Risk Assessment & Management(7 mappings)
BSI IT-Grundschutz: Incident Response(6 mappings)
BSI IT-Grundschutz: Configuration Management(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other BSI IT-Grundschutz comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
BSI IT-Grundschutz has 32 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection, where 5 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.
How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Of 32 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 15 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
17 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The domain with the highest gap count is BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.