Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsChina Data Security Law (DSL)

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to China Data Security Law (DSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to China Data Security Law (DSL) with 19% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Risk Assessment & Management(10 mappings)

BSI-13Risk assessment procedures3 targets
DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment
BSI-15Security categorization4 targets
DSL-II-01Data Classification and Grading System
DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment
BSI-17Continuous monitoring strategy3 targets
DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Incident Response(3 mappings)

BSI-18Incident response planning and testing
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response
BSI-20Incident reporting and notification
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response
BSI-21Forensic analysis capabilities
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 32 controls across its framework, while China Data Security Law (DSL) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection, where 6 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct China Data Security Law (DSL) equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

Of 32 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 6 map directly to China Data Security Law (DSL) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to China Data Security Law (DSL)?

26 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in China Data Security Law (DSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

The domain with the highest gap count is BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.