Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsC2M2

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to C2M2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to C2M2 with 38% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity(9 mappings)

BSI-03Multi-factor authentication requirements3 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-08Electronic access perimeter management
C2M2-10Revocation of access procedures
BSI-04Remote access controls3 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-08Electronic access perimeter management
C2M2-10Revocation of access procedures
BSI-05Wireless access restrictions3 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-08Electronic access perimeter management
C2M2-10Revocation of access procedures

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Risk Assessment & Management(8 mappings)

BSI-13Risk assessment procedures2 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
BSI-15Security categorization3 targets
C2M2-02System security categorization
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
BSI-17Continuous monitoring strategy3 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-13Network security monitoring
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Incident Response(3 mappings)

BSI-18Incident response planning and testing3 targets
C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
C2M2-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and C2M2?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 32 controls across its framework, while C2M2 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection, where 6 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct C2M2 equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and C2M2?

Of 32 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 12 map directly to C2M2 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to C2M2?

20 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in C2M2. The highest concentration of gaps is in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and C2M2?

The domain with the highest gap count is BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.