Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsSouth Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

48
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) with 42% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 48 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(20 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership10 targets
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 29Safety Measures
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 35Right of Access
Art. 40Establishment and Composition
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing
HUN-2Definitions
HUN-3Fundamental Rules
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions3 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 7Minimum Standards
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT5 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art.2Definitions
Art.8Prohibited Acts
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications2 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing

+28 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 10 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 8 map directly to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

11 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.