Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsCOSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) with 26% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(6 mappings)

BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Resilience Model(1 mappings)

BS65000-RM-03Leadership and Culture
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 12 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 5 map directly to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

14 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.