Cross-Framework Mapping

BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment MethodvsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Materials and Waste(3 mappings)

Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials3 targets
EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

Management(3 mappings)

PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
PMF-M.3Privacy Risk Assessment2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs

Related Comparisons

Other BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method has 31 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Management, where 7 BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 31 total BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls, 3 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

28 BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.