TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020)vsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)

See exactly how Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) controls map to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) maps to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) with 16% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Brazil Open Finance Cap. IV: Data Sharing, Consent and Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Brazil Open Finance Cap. IV: Data Sharing, Consent and Security(3 mappings)

BR-OF-A16Security measures by transmitter/account holder
→AUCDR-IS-2Secure the network and systems within the data environment
BR-OF-A17Customer authentication procedures
→AUCDR-IS-1Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment
BR-OF-A8Consent for data and transaction sharing
→AUCDR-IS-1Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Brazil Open Finance Cap. VI-VIII: Convention, Oversight and Final Provisions(1 mappings)

BR-OF-A48Risk management policies
→AUCDR-IS-4Formal vulnerability management program

Brazil Open Finance Cap. III: Scope of Sharing and Participants(1 mappings)

BR-OF-A5Scope of data and services shared
→AUCDR-IS-3Securely manage information assets over their lifecycle

Related Comparisons

Other Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) comparisons

Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) vs LGPD3 mappings

Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)18 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)7 mappingsGDPR vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)6 mappingsACSC Essential Eight vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) has 31 controls across its framework, while Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Brazil Open Finance Cap. IV: Data Sharing, Consent and Security, where 9 Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) controls have no direct Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) equivalent.

How many controls map between Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

Of 31 total Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) controls, 5 map directly to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

26 Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) controls have no direct equivalent in Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Brazil Open Finance Cap. IV: Data Sharing, Consent and Security with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020) and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Brazil Open Finance Cap. IV: Data Sharing, Consent and Security (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.