Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)
See exactly how Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 21% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter I: General Provisions(3 mappings)
Chapter V: Supervisory Authority(4 mappings)
Chapter VI: Sanctions and Penalties(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) comparisons
Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) has 29 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects, where 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.
How many controls map between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
Of 29 total Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls, 6 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
23 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.