TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 29% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title 1: General Provisions(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security

Title 4: Remedies and Penalties(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties2 targets
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TSSR-INFO-1Network Data Protection

Title 2: Data Protection Authority(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-7Article 23 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority2 targets
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TSSR-INFO-1Network Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Greece Law 4624/2019 — Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) Implementation Act7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Ethiopia Personal Data Protection Proclamation (No. 1321/2024)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Kuwait Data Privacy Protection Regulation (KDPPR, 2021 — CMA Directive)7 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations, where 3 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 14 total Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls, 4 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

10 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title 3: Specific Processing Situations (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.