Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 50% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(4 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management

Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection(1 mappings)

BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(11 mappings)

BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
BE-CF-14Vulnerability scanning and management2 targets
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
BE-CF-15Security categorization3 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
BE-CF-16Threat intelligence integration
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy3 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(3 mappings)

BE-CF-20Incident reporting and notification
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
BE-CF-21Forensic analysis capabilities
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
BE-CF-22Lessons learned and improvement
CSA-INF-04Incident Management

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Audit & Accountability(1 mappings)

BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 5 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 16 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

16 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.