Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 48% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

BCBS239-06Network security and segmentation
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
BCBS239-09Encryption and key management
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
BCBS239-10Secure configuration standards
ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures2 targets
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and South Korea ISMS-P?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance, where 3 BCBS 239 controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 12 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to South Korea ISMS-P?

13 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Information Security Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.