BCBS 239vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems
See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
BCBS 239 maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 28% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)
BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(2 mappings)
BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other BCBS 239 comparisons
Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between BCBS 239 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 7 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
18 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Information Security Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.