TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsSWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security and Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(1 mappings)

AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→SWIFT-ACC-01Logical Access Control

Access Control and Identity Management(6 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→SWIFT-ACC-01Logical Access Control
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
→SWIFT-ACC-01Logical Access Control
→SWIFT-ACC-02Token Management
→SWIFT-ACC-03Password Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls2 targets
→SWIFT-ACC-01Logical Access Control
→SWIFT-ENV-04Physical Security

Network and Communications Security(1 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
→SWIFT-ENV-01SWIFT Environment Protection

System Security and Operations(1 mappings)

AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
→SWIFT-ENV-02Operating System Security

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity12 mappings

Other SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappingsPropTech Security Standards - Smart Building Cybersecurity vs SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 725 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security and Operations, where 3 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 6 map directly to SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)?

31 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security and Operations with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security and Operations (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.