Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsOWASP MASVS

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to OWASP MASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
78
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to OWASP MASVS with 11% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 79 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP MASVS?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while OWASP MASVS covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct OWASP MASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP MASVS?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 10 map directly to OWASP MASVS controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 79 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to OWASP MASVS?

79 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP MASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP MASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.