Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management2 targets
FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-02Lloyd's Incident Reporting

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 6 map directly to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

19 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.