Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsDoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture with 52% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
DOD-ZT-14Vulnerability scanning and management
DOD-ZT-15Security categorization
DOD-ZT-17Continuous monitoring strategy

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
DOD-ZT-01Account management and provisioning
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
DOD-ZT-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
DOD-ZT-02Access enforcement and least privilege

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
DOD-ZT-15Security categorization
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
DOD-ZT-08Cryptographic protection of data

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(9 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation3 targets
DOD-ZT-25Security impact analysis
DOD-ZT-26System component inventory
DOD-ZT-27Software usage restrictions
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening3 targets
DOD-ZT-25Security impact analysis
DOD-ZT-26System component inventory
DOD-ZT-27Software usage restrictions
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management3 targets
DOD-ZT-25Security impact analysis
DOD-ZT-26System component inventory
DOD-ZT-27Software usage restrictions

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging3 targets
DOD-ZT-17Continuous monitoring strategy
DOD-ZT-28Audit event logging and storage
DOD-ZT-29Audit record review and analysis

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance, where 4 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 13 map directly to DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture?

12 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.