TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines with 52% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(9 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management3 targets
→CJIS-6Account Management
→ICS-AC-3Account management
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud3 targets
→CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
→ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
→NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments3 targets
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-3Account management
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→ICS-NS-3Remote access security
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
→AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation2 targets
→ICS-NS-1Network segmentation
→ICS-NS-5Network monitoring and intrusion detection
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→ICS-PM-2System hardening
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
→ICS-PM-2System hardening

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud, where 3 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 13 map directly to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

12 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.