TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsChina Data Security Law (DSL)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to China Data Security Law (DSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to China Data Security Law (DSL) with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
→DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
→DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
→DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→DSL-II-01Data Classification and Grading System
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→DSL-II-02National Core Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→DSL-II-02National Core Data Protection
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud
→DSL-II-02National Core Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud
→DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other China Data Security Law (DSL) comparisons

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs China Data Security Law (DSL)8 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs China Data Security Law (DSL)8 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappingsCCPA/CPRA vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappingsColorado Privacy Act vs China Data Security Law (DSL)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while China Data Security Law (DSL) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct China Data Security Law (DSL) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 6 map directly to China Data Security Law (DSL) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to China Data Security Law (DSL)?

19 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in China Data Security Law (DSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.