TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsChina Cybersecurity Law (CSL)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) with 12% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→CSL-V-02Cybersecurity Emergency Response

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
→CSL-III-02Network Security Management System

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→CSL-III-06Security Incident Response Plan
→CSL-IV-03Data Breach Notification

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 3 map directly to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

22 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.