TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 64% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(5 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 28 — Civil Court Jurisdiction
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 — Data Subject Rights Implementation3 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
→PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
AT-DSG-12Section 62 — Administrative Penalties
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25

Part 5: Implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive(6 mappings)

AT-DSG-13Section 36 — Scope of Law Enforcement Processing3 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
→PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
AT-DSG-14Section 38 — Data Subject Rights in Law Enforcement3 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
→PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-2Section 2 — Scope and Application
→FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 — Video Surveillance (CCTV)
→ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
→PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
AT-DSG-8Section 22 — Functions and Powers
→FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20229 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20219 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles9 mappings

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

EU Maritime Single Window Environment Regulation (EU) 2019/1239 vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience13 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience13 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 3 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 9 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

5 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.