TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsUnion Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
→Art. 264Risk analysis for exit

Risk Management(6 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
→Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
→Art. 264Risk analysis for exit
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment2 targets
→Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
→Art. 264Risk analysis for exit
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment2 targets
→Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
→Art. 264Risk analysis for exit

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 comparisons

FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsAPPI vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20138 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 13 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 4 map directly to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

35 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.