Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsUK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities with 28% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supply Chain and Dependencies(5 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures2 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance
FSyP 7.1Cyber and Information Risk Management

Identity and Access Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
FSyP 6.2Access Control

Event and Incident Response(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan
FSyP 7.5Cyber Incident Preparedness and Response
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability
FSyP 7.5Cyber Incident Preparedness and Response
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting
FSyP 7.5Cyber Incident Preparedness and Response

Risk Management(6 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
FSyP 7.3Protection of Nuclear Technology and Operations
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FSyP 7.1Cyber and Information Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance
FSyP 7.1Cyber and Information Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
FSyP 7.1Cyber and Information Risk Management

Threat and Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
FSyP 7.1Cyber and Information Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Other UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 12 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 11 map directly to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

28 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.