Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) with 44% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supply Chain and Dependencies(7 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures3 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-01Risk Management Measures
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management4 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-01Risk Management Measures
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-03Management Accountability
EUDR-CE-03Penalties

Identity and Access Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties

Event and Incident Response(9 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan3 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-02Incident Reporting
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability3 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-02Incident Reporting
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting3 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-02Incident Reporting
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Situational Awareness and Event Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Threat and Vulnerability Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Other NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 17 map directly to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

22 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.