Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)vsAustralia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations
See exactly how Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls map to Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) maps to Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 76 Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls identifies 75 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Part 3-1: General protections and sham arrangements – Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 76 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
Part 3-5A: Sexual harassment in connection with work – Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)(1 mappings)
A Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations controls your existing Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 1% in the header counts how many Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) comparisons
Other Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations?
Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) has 76 controls across its framework, while Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations covers 235 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 3-1: General protections and sham arrangements – Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), where 12 Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls have no direct Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations equivalent.
How many controls map between Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations?
Of 76 total Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls, 1 map directly to Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations controls, representing 1% coverage. The remaining 75 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations?
75 Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) controls have no direct equivalent in Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 3-1: General protections and sham arrangements – Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations?
The domain with the highest gap count is Part 3-1: General protections and sham arrangements – Australia Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.