Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)vsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management
See exactly how Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls map to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) maps to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls identifies 59 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter 2M: Financial and sustainability records, reports and lodgement – Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.
Chapter 7 Part 7.6: Australian financial services licence and general obligations – Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)(1 mappings)
A Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls your existing Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 2% in the header counts how many Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) comparisons
Other APRA CPS 220 Risk Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,016 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?
Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) has 60 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 220 Risk Management covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 2M: Financial and sustainability records, reports and lodgement – Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), where 16 Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls have no direct APRA CPS 220 Risk Management equivalent.
How many controls map between Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?
Of 60 total Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls, 1 map directly to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls, representing 2% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?
59 Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 2M: Financial and sustainability records, reports and lodgement – Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 2M: Financial and sustainability records, reports and lodgement – Australia Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.