Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles with 26% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(13 mappings)

CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan2 targets
BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance3 targets
BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM2 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT

Consent and Authorization(7 mappings)

CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Other Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 29 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 13 map directly to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

37 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.