Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia AI Ethics FrameworkvsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)

See exactly how Australia AI Ethics Framework controls map to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia AI Ethics Framework maps to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) with 20% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Risk Management(10 mappings)

AU-AI-01AI risk identification and assessment
SOCI-S30CUVulnerability assessments
AU-AI-02AI system categorization by risk level3 targets
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP
AU-AI-04AI model validation and testing3 targets
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP
AU-AI-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring3 targets
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Safety & Security(2 mappings)

AU-AI-21AI system robustness and resilience2 targets
SOCI-S30BCNotification of critical cyber security incidents (12 hours)
SOCI-S30BDNotification of other cyber security incidents (72 hours)

Related Comparisons

Other Australia AI Ethics Framework comparisons

Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

Australia AI Ethics Framework has 25 controls across its framework, while Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight, where 5 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

Of 25 total Australia AI Ethics Framework controls, 5 map directly to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia AI Ethics Framework to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

20 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct equivalent in Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.