TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia AI Ethics FrameworkvsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Australia AI Ethics Framework controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia AI Ethics Framework maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Risk Management(4 mappings)

AU-AI-01AI risk identification and assessment4 targets
→FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Data Governance(3 mappings)

AU-AI-14Privacy protection in AI training data
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
AU-AI-15Data retention for AI models2 targets
→FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Safety & Security(2 mappings)

AU-AI-21AI system robustness and resilience2 targets
→FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

Related Comparisons

Other Australia AI Ethics Framework comparisons

Australia AI Ethics Framework vs ISO 4200112 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs IEEE 700012 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD AI Principles12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs EU AI Act12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs UK AI Regulation Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs China AI Regulations12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Singapore AI Governance Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Japan AI Guidelines12 mappings

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia AI Ethics Framework and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Australia AI Ethics Framework has 25 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight, where 5 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia AI Ethics Framework and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 25 total Australia AI Ethics Framework controls, 4 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia AI Ethics Framework to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

21 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia AI Ethics Framework and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.