Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(1 mappings)

4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
USSDWA-2Cybersecurity Practices (Assessment, Access, Network, IR)

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 42 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements covers 3 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 6 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 42 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 1 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

41 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.