Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsUK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Implementation and Operation(2 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority2 targets
UKGAMBLE-1Scope and Applicability to Licensees
UKGAMBLE-4Resilience and Incident Response

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(1 mappings)

4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
UKGAMBLE-4Resilience and Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 42 controls across its framework, while UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 6 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Of 42 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 2 map directly to UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements?

40 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.