Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(1 mappings)

4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements
KRCSAP-1CSAP Certification Tiers (IaaS, SaaS, DaaS, AI)

Implementation and Operation(2 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
KRCSAP-1CSAP Certification Tiers (IaaS, SaaS, DaaS, AI)
4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness
KRCSAP-1CSAP Certification Tiers (IaaS, SaaS, DaaS, AI)

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 44 controls across its framework, while South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 6 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

Of 44 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 3 map directly to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

41 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.