Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience StandardvsISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard maps to ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Checking and Corrective Action.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(1 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
ISO-22313-8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment

Implementation and Operation(3 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(3 mappings)

4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery3 targets
ISO-22313-5.2Policy
ISO-22313-6.2Business continuity objectives and plans to achieve them
ISO-22313-6.3Planning changes to the BCMS

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard has 22 controls across its framework, while ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems covers 145 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Checking and Corrective Action, where 5 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems?

Of 22 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 3 map directly to ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard to ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems?

19 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Checking and Corrective Action with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Checking and Corrective Action (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.