Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 41% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Detect and Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Detect and Respond(5 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-DR-2Incident Response Plan
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures
SWIFT-DET-01Logging and Monitoring
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures
SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

Board and Governance(2 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-GOV-1Board Oversight of Cyber Risk
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
ASIC-CYB-GOV-2Cyber Risk in Enterprise Risk Management
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management

Identify and Protect(5 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control4 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A07:2025Authentication Failures
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
ASIC-CYB-ID-4Configuration Management
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration

Resilience and Recovery(1 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-RES-1Business Continuity Planning
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and OWASP Top 10:2025?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Detect and Respond, where 4 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 9 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to OWASP Top 10:2025?

13 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Detect and Respond with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Detect and Respond (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.