Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Detect and Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Board and Governance(6 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-GOV-1Board Oversight of Cyber Risk3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
ASIC-CYB-GOV-2Cyber Risk in Enterprise Risk Management3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation

Detect and Respond(6 mappings)

SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection3 targets
ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response3 targets
ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Detect and Respond, where 6 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

18 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Detect and Respond with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Detect and Respond (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.