TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule with 24% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(2 mappings)

ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)2 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(7 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)3 targets
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
→NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)3 targets
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
→NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(8 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
→314.4(d)Continuous monitoring and testing
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)3 targets
→314.4(h)Incident response plan
→314.4(j)FTC breach notification
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(6)Security incident procedures
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)
→314.4(d)Continuous monitoring and testing
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)3 targets
→314.4(h)Incident response plan
→314.4(j)FTC breach notification
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(6)Security incident procedures

Preventing Malicious Insiders(2 mappings)

ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)2 targets
→314.4(e)Security awareness training
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(5)Security awareness and training

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 16 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 9 map directly to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

28 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.