Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 41% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(9 mappings)

ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)2 targets
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)2 targets
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)2 targets
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)3 targets
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(5 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)2 targets
3.7Identification and Authentication
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)2 targets
3.7Identification and Authentication
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(6 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)2 targets
3.6Incident Response
3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)
3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)2 targets
3.6Incident Response
3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 15 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

22 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.