TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 27% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(1 mappings)

ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(5 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(6 mappings)

ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Recovering Data and System Availability(6 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

Preventing Malicious Insiders(1 mappings)

ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
→Sec. 314.4(e)Security awareness training

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 16 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 10 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

27 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.