TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 38% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(1 mappings)

ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(7 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)2 targets
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
→CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
→CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(4 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management

Recovering Data and System Availability(8 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)3 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)3 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)2 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 16 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 14 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

23 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.