ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)vsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 10% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 136 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls identifies 122 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personnel Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 136 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Personnel Security(3 mappings)
Gateways and Content Filtering(1 mappings)
Cryptography(2 mappings)
Cyber Security Principles and Governance(4 mappings)
System Monitoring and Event Logging(2 mappings)
Patch Management(2 mappings)
Network Security(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) has 136 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personnel Security, where 20 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 136 total ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls, 14 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 122 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
122 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Personnel Security with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Personnel Security (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.