Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 60% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Infrastructure and Operations Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(7 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment3 targets
AIRMF-MAP-02AI Risk Identification
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
NIST-AI600-MAP-2Stakeholder Impact Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence2 targets
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIRMF-MAN-01AI Risk Treatment
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response

Data Security and Privacy(8 mappings)

CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
NIST-AI600-MGT-1Content Provenance Implementation
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
NIST-AI600-MGT-5Decommissioning Procedures
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design6 targets
AIRMF-MAP-02AI Risk Identification
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
NIST-AI600-GOV-1Legal and Regulatory Compliance
NIST-AI600-MAP-1GAI Risk Identification
NIST-AI600-MAP-2Stakeholder Impact Assessment
NIST-AI600-MEA-3Privacy Leak Assessment

Infrastructure and Operations Security(5 mappings)

CSA-INF-04Incident Management4 targets
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response
AIRMF-MEA-01AI Performance Metrics
NIST-AI600-MGT-4Incident Response for GAI
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Infrastructure and Operations Security, where 3 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 9 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

6 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Infrastructure and Operations Security with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Infrastructure and Operations Security (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.