Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
53
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems with 12% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 69 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 71 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 69 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(8 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment2 targets
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

Operation(1 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(3 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS2 targets
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
GLI33-1.2Wager Types and Rules

Planning (Clause 6)(4 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities4 targets
38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
GLI33-3.4Risk Management Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

Other GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 69 controls across its framework, while GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems covers 66 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 11 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

Of 69 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 9 map directly to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 71 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

71 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.